C++ and Portability. First, a basic fact in C and C++ is that the alignment of a type can not exceed the size of the type. If it would, then it would not be possible to allocate memory using malloc(N*sizeof(the_type)). Layout the struct, starting with the largest types. In this article. One of the low-level features of C++ is the ability to specify the precise alignment of objects in memory to take maximum advantage of a specific hardware architecture. By default, the compiler aligns class and struct members on their size value: bool and char are aligned on one byte boundaries, short on two byte, int on four bytes. Struct member alignment in C++/Boost. If you have your boost project in visual the alignment is under Properties-> C/C+1-> Code Generation -> Struct Member Alignment. If you use another tool find how options are provided to the compiler and pass /Zp1 (or -Zp1).
Default struct member alignment c++
Structural Padding & Packing In C & C++, time: 15:28
Tags: M-audio audiophile 24/96 softwareC and c compiler software, Irwa al ghaleel music , Alvin risk soundcloud er, Margin of safety pdf I can't find anything definitive that specifies the default alignment of structure members for VS Experimentally, I haven't been able to make a struct violate 4 byte alignment without changing the default packing. All I have been able to find out is that the default packing is 8 bytes and that we're using that everywhere. In this article. One of the low-level features of C++ is the ability to specify the precise alignment of objects in memory to take maximum advantage of a specific hardware architecture. By default, the compiler aligns class and struct members on their size value: bool and char are aligned on one byte boundaries, short on two byte, int on four bytes. Struct member alignment in C++/Boost. If you have your boost project in visual the alignment is under Properties-> C/C+1-> Code Generation -> Struct Member Alignment. If you use another tool find how options are provided to the compiler and pass /Zp1 (or -Zp1). If you have unusual alignment constraints for dynamically allocated data, you might need to explicit the alignment, e.g. by using posix_memalign to allocate them. malloc and related allocators (including::operator new in C++) probably won't align better than what the default constraints require. C++ and Portability. First, a basic fact in C and C++ is that the alignment of a type can not exceed the size of the type. If it would, then it would not be possible to allocate memory using malloc(N*sizeof(the_type)). Layout the struct, starting with the largest types. Structure alignment in Visual C++. The alignment of a member will be on a boundary that is either a multiple of n or a multiple of the size of the member, whichever is smaller. Let's assume a pack value of 8 bytes (which is the default). Within a struct, I'd think that any member whose size is less than 8 bytes will be at an offset.
I regret, but I can help nothing. I know, you will find the correct decision. Do not despair.
Rather amusing message